User talk:Matt.whitby

Additional tips:

Here are some extra tips to help you get around Wikipedia:

If you made any edits before you got an account, you might be interested in assigning those to your username.
If you want to play around with your new Wiki skills, try the Sandbox.
Click on the Edit button on a page, and look at how other editors did what they did.
You can sign your name using three tildes, like this: NaodW29-nowiki29d1439469cda1be00000001. If you use four, you can add a datestamp too. Always sign comments on Talk pages, never sign Articles.
You might want to add yourself to the New User Log
If your first language isn't English, try Wikipedia:Contributing to articles outside your native language
If you ever think a page or image should be deleted, please list it at the Votes for Deletion (VfD) page. There is also a Votes for Undeletion page if you want to retrieve something that you think should not have been deleted.

Happy editing!

Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 23:41, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Image source

Thank you for uploading Image:Turing_flat.jpg. Its copyright status is unclear, so it may have to be deleted. Please leave a note on the image page about the source of the image. Thank you.

Hi Matt, this is no longer a problem, see the Village Pump. Meow! --iMb~Mw 08:30, 16 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading a bigger version; I really like the photograph, but I'm a crypto-buff...Anyway, we've fixed the image so that it's a normal size inline -- the software can automatically "thumbnail" it within the page, but when you click on it you get the full version. Uploading images to Wikipedia is one of the more difficult and obscure things you can do, and takes a bit of getting used to. Don't worry about making mistakes, your contributions are very welcome! Cheers, — Matt Crypto 08:35, 16 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Hi; your Rilo Kiley image is excellent, but you've not indicated its copyright status. If you've released it under the GFDL, could you please add the {{GFDL}} tag to the image's description page? If it's under some other license, you can check out Wikipedia:Image copyright tags to find the right one. Thanks! -- Hadal 09:23, 19 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Okay, I've tagged it as GFDL for you. Cheers, -- Hadal 02:57, 20 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Image tags

Hi Matt. Thanks for your contributions, and in particular your images! But I hope you'll forgive me for nagging you about adding the copyright "tags" to the image pages. It is important to remember to do this, as we get a lot of copyright problems with images, and when Wikipedia eventually ends up in print or on CD or DVD we really need to have the status of images sorted out. And it is very easy to do: simply add a {{GFDL}} or {{PD}} tag to the image description page. It'd be much appreciated! — Matt Crypto 16:53, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Dont delete my stuff

Dont delete my info on ilford due, i now the town inside out. i dont delete your stuff or anyone elses. i'm providing the street level info on ilfor.

Joinee

Are you a Joinee?

No, but it looks interesting. Might send a photo and see what happens. Cantthinkofagoodname 10:57, 1 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't been involved with either Wiki or Join Me for all that long, and my recent posting was the first time the two had crossed :-) Salty Kid | talk 15:03, 4 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Matt, thanks for dropping by on my talk page :-) I love Wikipedia. Way back at uni I was really into the idea of what I was then calling "self-healing databases" and nowadays it's wonderful to see things which make the internet genuinely collaborative again rather than just being a place to sellsellsell and to merly consume information, which I think it became for a while, or at least was veering towards. Joinee K / Kierant 17:57, 4 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Oscars hosts

There was a mispelling in the title of your recent article on Oscars hosts. I moved the article to the correct title I think you intended. -- Longhair | Talk 12:02, 13 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Removing VfD tags prematurely

Do not remove VfD tags prematurely, as you did on Beer Hall of Fame. VfD tags are to remain on an article until the VfD voting and discussion has completed. Similarly, cleanup tags should remain on an article until the cleanup work is done, which has not been accomplished yet on the Beer Hall of Fame article. I strongly welcome your edits on Wikipedia! Just please be sure to do such edits in line with Wikipedia policies. Thanks. --Durin 17:47, 25 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks very much for the congratulations! I noticed your signature goes to User:Matt.Whitby (with a capital "W"), rather than User:Matt.whitby (with a lowercase "w"), which means people end up at the wrong page (Wikipedia is case sensitive). You'd likely be able to fix this by fiddling in the preferences. Thanks again! — Matt Crypto 21:34, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Conspiracy Videos

I think it would be more appropriate to tag is as a VfD. By the way, you need not mention the reason for CSD candidate on the article's talk page, you can use the {{db|reason}} (deletebecause) template. Keep up the good work. utcursch | talk July 5, 2005 08:31 (UTC)

Ok, thanks.. i'll make sure I use that tag in future. Thanks for you help. -- Matt Whitby

VfDs

Hello. Please finish Your Votes for Deletion initiatives... See: Wikipedia:Guide_to_Votes_for_Deletion and the end of Wikipedia:Votes_for_deletion. With best wishes, Feydey 13:05, 15 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted article

Hello there. I have a quick question. Is there a list of articles which have been deleted, as one of mine seems to have gone and I can't think of any good recent for it being removed? Cheers --[[User:Matt.whitby|-- user:Matt.whitby]] 14:31, 18 July 2005 (UTC) User:Matt.whitby[reply]

You could search through the log of deleted pages: [1]. You might try searching through your own contribution list, as well: [2]. Hope that's some help. — Matt Crypto 16:13, 18 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Buildings in honour of American presidents

I am not sure that this category isn't redundant, but if it is to retained, and since it is about an American topic, should't the spelling of "honour" be the US spelling "honor"? --Rogerd 17:33, July 30, 2005 (UTC)

Image:M alison atkins ark.jpg

The licensing information you provided for that image says "Permission given to show image on Wikipedia". That sounds rather unlikely. Either the image is out of copyright (unfortunately, there's no publication year given), or it is still in copyright and is unfree. Can you clarify? Rl 17:13, 17 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that should be in the Public Domain then. I updated the image description page accordingly. Thank you. Rl 10:11, 18 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Mathematical numbers

Hi. You created Category:Mathematical numbers. It is not clear to me what this category is supposed to contain; furthermore, the name mathematical numbers itself seems rather strange to me (are there any numbers that are not mathematical?). Did you check that none of the subcategories of Category:Numbers like Category:Integer sequences fulfils the purpose that your category is supposed to serve? Cheers, Jitse Niesen (talk) 21:54, 19 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Gunfright

I removed the VFD tag you placed on this article as it never seems to have actually been submitted for deletion, and there is precedent on wikipedia for articles on computer games, even eighties spectrum ones. Djbrianuk 22:32, 30 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Billy Joel spam

I noticed that you re-added a "spam" link in the Billy Joel article. I assume you did this without knowing that link—pianofanman.com—is a known spam link and should not be in the article. An anon user keeps adding it and we keep deleting it. Just FYI. If you see it deleted again in the future (which it most likely will be since the anon user is rather relentless), it shouldn't be re-added. Thanks. — Frecklefoot | Talk 15:34, September 9, 2005 (UTC)

Hi. What's a spam link. I went to the link and I don't recall it having any popups, if that's what you mean by spam link. I certainly won't add it back, but if you could explain the term it'd be helpful. Looked like quite a good site to me.

Best wishes, -- User:matt.whitby

Let's keep this discussion here. A spam link is a link that points to a commercial site, no matter how good it is. Amazon.com is a great site, but we don't link to it (except from it's own article). This explains it in more detail. Peace. :-) — Frecklefoot | Talk 16:54, September 9, 2005 (UTC)

Oh, is it a commerical site? I didn't realise it was.

2005 Kashmir earthquake

Thank you for your contribution at 2005 Kashmir earthquake. Please keep it up!!!Pradeepsomani (talk)

Image copyright problem with Image:War-memorial-east-end-newbury.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:War-memorial-east-end-newbury.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you. Admrb♉ltz (T | C) 00:34, 23 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Basicly all you need to do is edit the image page, and add {{PD-self}} which I have done --Admrb♉ltz (T | C) 14:25, 23 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Toga (penguin)

This article created by you has been nominated for deletion here Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Toga (penguin). Please vote keep quickly — for some reason people don't think this is encyclopedic. --TimPope 19:02, 26 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Make povery history band plastic.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Make povery history band plastic.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. cohesion★talk 09:21, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I took the image and am happy to release it into the public domain. I spent ten minutes trying to work out who to apply the tagb, but it's not explained clearly enough. If you'd like to add the tag then you're more than welcome. Best wishes. ~~User:Matt.whitby

Cool, thanks for the reply, I tagged it as public domain already and it's not in danger of being deleted anymore :D - cohesion★talk 07:17, 9 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:Buckhurst_hill_tube.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Buckhurst_hill_tube.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see User talk:Carnildo/images. 11:59, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have added the appropriate tag. The tag you are after is added to an mage description simply by including the text {{GFDL-self}}. --Martyman-(talk) 10:49, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Woops, sorry I got that wrong. You where after the PD tag which is {{PD-self}}. I will fix the image description. --Martyman-(talk) 10:51, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Helpful Tips

Hi Matt. I notice the welcome message left for you at the top of the page does not clearly explain how to easily sign your talk posts. I am going to add my default welcome message below, as I feel it has lots of useful info for new editors. If it is cluttering up your talk page too much and you don't find it useful, please feel free to delete it. --Martyman-(talk) 10:58, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello Matt, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

The five pillars of Wikipedia	How to edit a page
Help pages	Tutorial
How to write a great article	Manual of Style
Copyright Information	User Page Info

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. --Martyman-(talk) 10:58, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Enuff znuff.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Enuff znuff.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL-self}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Shyam ^(T/C) 16:07, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Pdp11.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Pdp11.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you. Stan 04:17, 15 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I added the tag. You can put it anywhere in the image page; I usually position at the end, because for some tags the boilerplate text is so long it goes off the bottom of the screen, and relevant info below it can get missed. Stan 15:47, 15 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Rufus-wainwright.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Rufus-wainwright.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see User talk:Carnildo/images. 16:12, 15 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:James holworthy landscape.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:James holworthy landscape.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL-self}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Shyam ^(T/C) 22:56, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

IT trainer

IT trainer has been proposed for deletion. Please see the article for details. NickelShoe (Talk) 20:06, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright notification

Hi!

Wikimedia received a copyright violation notification via OTRS from The Friends of Kensal Green Cemetery. I've removed (at least temporarily) the content they are concerned about, and will discuss with them how best you might maintain your todo list without infringing. (btw: WOW, that's a big project! impressed...) - Amgine 05:46, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, yes. At least, when there is clear evidence of categorization and qualifying, which that list has. One possible method of avoiding conflict might be to create an alphabetized - but not categorized - listing. Or to list only those persons you've already created or found on the en.WP. And of course to give credit (and a linkback) to the original source would do much in the effort to be polite. I'd be happy to help with this if you'd like some help. (I have not yet received a reply from Kensal Green) - Amgine 16:12, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion

I've added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Ghinzu, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Importance). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree, discuss the issues raised at Talk:Ghinzu. If you remove the {{dated prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Steven Fruitsmaak | Talk 13:43, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel Whitby is unsourced

Hello Matt. When you have a free moment, could you please provide cite sources for the Daniel Whitby article? Can't sleep, clown will eat me 19:35, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Karen Boyer

I've added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Karen Boyer, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at Talk:Karen Boyer. Removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, but the article may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.161.229.106 (talk • contribs) 13:16, 31 December 2006

Centre for Death and Society

Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Centre for Death and Society, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. --Eastmain 18:22, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop

restoring a deleted article to the disambiguation page Raymond Price. Please see WP:DAB for more information about the purpose of these pages. --kingboyk 12:33, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Cecil_sharp_house.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Cecil_sharp_house.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. MER-C 11:12, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Cold roses.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Cold roses.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:25, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Scott Appel

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Scott Appel, by Brianga (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Scott Appel seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Scott Appel, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it did not nominate Scott Appel itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 21:07, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Scott Appel - Nine of swords.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Scott Appel - Nine of swords.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 22:09, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Scott Appel - Nine of swords.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Scott Appel - Nine of swords.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 11:13, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with Image:Civil partnership elton john.jpg

An image that you uploaded, Image:Civil partnership elton john.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Richmeister_talk 10:34, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Makelovenotspam.gif

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Makelovenotspam.gif. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. PxMa 00:52, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Frisbie album.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Frisbie album.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:28, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Fifteen-logo.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Fifteen-logo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:43, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Ist band.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Ist band.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 23:10, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Appeared on "Later with Jools Holland"

Category:Appeared on "Later with Jools Holland", which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Viriditas (talk) 13:08, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mabus

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Mabus, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.mabus.biz. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 07:47, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of AfD notice from Ben Kinsella

It may not have been your intention, but your recent edit to Ben Kinsella removed an "Articles for deletion" notice. These notices should remain in place until consensus has been reached at the deletion discussion. If you disagree with the proposed deletion, you can comment at the debate for this article here. Best, Gr1st (talk) 10:15, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of UK victims of knife crime

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article UK victims of knife crime, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. tomasz. 12:27, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No content in Category:Ren and Stimpy episodes

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Category:Ren and Stimpy episodes, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Category:Ren and Stimpy episodes has been empty for at least four days, and its only content has been links to parent categories. (CSD C1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Category:Ren and Stimpy episodes, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 15:10, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

George Lamb/Ray Davies

Matt,

In their Broadcasting Bullitin, released today (8th Dec), Ofcom said they found the George Lamb/Ray Davies interview to not be in breach of generally accepted standards or the Broadcasting Code. Because of this I have removed the paragraph about the interview which you added to George_Lamb_(presenter) on 2nd Oct[3], as it does not seem noteworthy to keep a reference to something that was not upheld by Ofcom or that attracted much attention outside the Kinks fan-base or 'remove George Lamb' community. For example, in the latest bulletin alone GMTV received complaints about generally accepted standards on regarding two separate incidents and were not upheld by Ofcom, and these are not included in the GMTV article either.

I am working hard to keep the George Lamb article in a NPOV and increase the information in the article that is of an encyclopedic nature. Hopefully you agree with the action I have taken. If you do not, I would very much like to discuss the issue with you, and any other members that have an opinion, so that we can find an amicable resolution.

Thanks, drak2 (talk) 23:21, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

December 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to attack other editors, as you did on User_talk:Wrenchhands. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Please try to welcome new users to Wikipedia, rather than tell them to cheer up. drak2 (talk) 00:24, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fools-gold.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Fools-gold.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 00:02, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Millenium Bridge.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Millenium Bridge.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 21:39, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Blue Cartoon

The article Blue Cartoon has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I can find no significant coverage of this band or other indication that it might meet WP:BAND. Tagged for notability since June 2009 without improvement.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Glenfarclas (talk) 02:47, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

re your edit to George Harrison

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to George Harrison. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. LessHeard vanU (talk) 14:15, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Matt.whitby! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot notifying you on behalf of the the unreferenced biographies team that 1 of the articles that you created is currently tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 710 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Alicia Hempleman-Adams - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 09:16, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Emma's Imagination

A tag has been placed on Emma's Imagination requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles – see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. role^player 20:15, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tim Leiweke

The article Tim Leiweke has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Thorncrag 06:51, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Banksy-art.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Banksy-art.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:30, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Zero days left.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Zero days left.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or provided a license tag. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, select the appropriate license tag from this list, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you can't find a suitable license tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 17:06, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Zero days left.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Zero days left.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Courcelles 00:23, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Enuff Z'nuff for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Enuff Z'nuff is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Enuff Z'nuff until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Guy (Help!) 18:21, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Mo matching drapes logo.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Mo matching drapes logo.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Acather96 (talk) 18:48, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Listentomysweetpipings maa.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Listentomysweetpipings maa.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Acather96 (talk) 18:51, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:MEA Hydrangeas.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:MEA Hydrangeas.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Acather96 (talk) 18:54, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

July 2011

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Amy Winehouse. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. U-Mos (talk) 16:23, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Rara (service)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Rara (service) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Ryan Vesey Review me! 19:02, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Removing Speedy at Rara (service)

Hi Matt.whitby, you recently removed a deletion tag from Rara (service). Because Wikipedia policy does not allow the creator of the page to remove speedy deletion tags, an automated program has replaced the tag. Although the deletion proposal may be incorrect, removing the tag is not the correct way for you to contest the deletion, even if you are more experienced than the nominator. Instead, please use the talk page to explain why the page should not be deleted. Remember to be patient, there is no harm in waiting for another experienced user to review the deletion and judge what the right course of action is. As you are involved, and therefore potentially biased, you should refrain from doing this yourself. Thank you, - SDPatrolBot (talk) 19:24, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Rara (service) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links to Web, Mobile, USP and Rob Lewis

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:09, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Rara (service) - correct naming

Hi Matt, first of all, thanks for taking the time to create the article on rara.com. I want to ask if you would mind changing the article's name/title to the correct name of the service which is actually rara.com rather than Rara. Hope this is ok. I will be glad to help edit and contribute to the article in the future. Many thanks. Tho2009 (talk) 01:08, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited The Nines (band), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Page, Independent and Universal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:51, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Blue Cartoon for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Blue Cartoon is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blue Cartoon until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. CutOffTies (talk) 17:41, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Geoffrey rhoades

Hello, Matt.whitby, and thank you for your contributions!

An article you worked on Geoffrey rhoades, appears to be directly copied from http://www.tate.org.uk/art/artists/geoffrey-rhoades-1834. Please take a minute to make sure that the text is freely licensed and properly attributed as a reference, otherwise the article may be deleted.

It's entirely possible that this bot made a mistake, so please feel free to remove this notice and the tag it placed on Geoffrey rhoades if necessary. MadmanBot (talk) 19:23, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with Geoffrey rhoades

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Geoffrey rhoades, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.bonhams.com/auctions/17087/lot/152/. As a copyright violation, Geoffrey rhoades appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Geoffrey rhoades has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Geoffrey rhoades and send an email with the message to permissions-enwikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at Talk:Geoffrey rhoades with a link to where we can find that note.
If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Geoffrey rhoades.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Hammersoft (talk) 19:25, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Removing Speedy at Geoffrey rhoades

Hi Matt.whitby, you recently removed a deletion tag from Geoffrey rhoades. Because Wikipedia policy does not allow the creator of the page to remove speedy deletion tags, an automated program has replaced the tag. Although the deletion proposal may be incorrect, removing the tag is not the correct way for you to contest the deletion, even if you are more experienced than the nominator. Instead, please use the talk page to explain why the page should not be deleted. Remember to be patient, there is no harm in waiting for another experienced user to review the deletion and judge what the right course of action is. As you are involved, and therefore potentially biased, you should refrain from doing this yourself. Thank you, - SDPatrolBot (talk) 19:33, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mary Ann Thurston

The article Mary Ann Thurston has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unref for several years; notability not really asserted

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 13:52, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Mary Ann Thurston

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Mary Ann Thurston requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content or organised event, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that your page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 07:20, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:58, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Matt.whitby. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Matt.whitby. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Interview request

Hi, I'm a journalist who's been working on a series about interesting stories on Wikipedia and Wikipedians. For example, I wrote about these two teenagers who edit articles for the NY subway and why St. Patrick's Wikipedia page is excellent. I'm working on a story about notable individuals who have passed away and wondered if I could interview you about Carrie Fischer's page. Could we by chance connect over email via stephenbharrison at gmail dot com .... Thank you! Stephenbharrison (talk) 20:43, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Leo Kuvayev for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Leo Kuvayev is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leo Kuvayev until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 16:47, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Matt.whitby. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Findagrave

Please note that findagrave is not a reliable source as discussed here. Thanks! DonIago (talk) 16:47, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Blue Cartoon

The article Blue Cartoon has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:BAND, mainly a vanity piece.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SITH (talk) 14:00, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Blue Cartoon moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Blue Cartoon, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Atlantic306 (talk) 14:39, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Blue Cartoon concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Blue Cartoon, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:25, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Blue Cartoon

Hello, Matt.whitby. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Blue Cartoon".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 14:33, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Mark Bacino

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Mark Bacino, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Praxidicae (talk) 19:24, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sam Pottle, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Great Barrington. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nigel Rogers

Hi, I noticed on twitter some people discussing the recent death of Nigel Rogers. I haven't been able to find any reliable sources for it, but I might not be getting the best search results as I'm in the US. Just thought I'd let you know as the article creator so you can keep an eye out for sources as well. Schazjmd (talk) 18:54, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Update: another editor found a source and updated the article. Schazjmd (talk) 14:50, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Schazjmd Thank you. His wife taught me the piano.

Proposed deletion of Paper Airplane Pilots

The article Paper Airplane Pilots has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable and there are no reliable sources. WP:BAND

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 𝗩𝗶𝗸𝗶𝗽𝗼𝗹𝗶𝗺𝗲𝗿 ℣ 20:30, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Paper Airplane Pilots

The article Paper Airplane Pilots has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 21:31, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Miles Mendoza for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Miles Mendoza is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miles Mendoza until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

2pou (talk) 22:07, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]