Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International Gnostic Movement
International Gnostic Movement was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was to keep the article.
An irredeemable mess. Jayjg 17:47, 7 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Delete: A mess, and "Gnostic" seems to be applied very liberally to mask something else, something more traditional. Geogre 19:15, 7 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. Quite a mess. This is a pseudo-spiritual new age rant parading as a WP article. Fire Star 23:04, 7 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Heh. That's the least of it. I helped cleanup some related articles and I discovered some really disturbing quotes from the guy. It's bordering on a cult.--Viriditas 11:03, 8 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Transcript of a speech, not an encyclopedia article. (I won't bother trying to find out if it has a point.) Delete. - Mike Rosoft 10:04, 8 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Keep. I despise this kooky stuff, but it's a real organization. I've edited the article down to the bare essentials. Now, I need to take a shower. --Viriditas 11:09, 8 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Well, now it's a two sentence stub. I'm surprised there was that much of value in the article. Jayjg 16:39, 8 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Neutral. Now down to a harmless, useless stub. -- Jmabel | Talk 02:14, Nov 9, 2004 (UTC)
- Keep: now a valid stub. T.P.K. 05:57, 9 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. Now a valid, and utterly useless stub Nuclear man 06:00, 9 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Keep The bellman 21:28, 2004 Nov 11 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like other '/delete' pages is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.