Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gervacio magno

Gervacio magno was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was DELETE

I don't know if this is vanity, nonsense, or other, but I vote for delete. RickK 22:34, Jul 18, 2004 (UTC)

• The article has been active since {{subst:vfd}} was placed on it; User:Npalforo is evidently trying to improve this vanity page. The penis comment was added by an anonymous user, and apparently Npalforo is okay with it? Just delete. --Ardonik 01:22, Jul 19, 2004 (UTC)
• Oh, please make this go away. Pretty please? - Lucky 6.9 04:26, 19 Jul 2004 (UTC)
• Delete: Vanity, I guess. Non-notable, I don't guess. He was one of the rebels? If so, there is potential, if he was more than just one of them. The writing here is too much of a tangle to tell. Geogre 13:50, 19 Jul 2004 (UTC)
• Delete, unless someone comes up with conclusive evidence he was some kind of really notable big cheese in the rebel movement thingy. I also propose half seriously that all stubby unwikified "bios" aka vanity pages where the last name is entirely lower case become automatic candidates for speedy deletion. Ianb 15:46, 19 Jul 2004 (UTC)
• Delete. DJ Clayworth 17:20, 19 Jul 2004 (UTC)
• Delete. I'm not sure whether it's vanity, nonsense, or other, but I am verging towards nonsense. Brequinda
• Delete. Postdlf 15:16, 23 Jul 2004 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like other '/delete' pages is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.