This category is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This category is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related
I think this is an inappropriate category name. It is being used mainly for classical music figures, but the name does not make this intention clear. Also, I see little benefit in restricting it to English people, rather than British people. I have set up a "Classical music in the United Kingdom" category, and I would like to shift all the relevant people into new categories as follows: British composers; British conductors; British classical musicians; British opera and classical singers. Does anyone have any comments? I would have no objection to separate categories being created for Scottish/Welsh/Northern Irish musicians, but the British classical music scene is not rigidly divided on national lines, so I would like to have comprehensive British categories. I will start reclassifying in a few days if no one comments. Philip 05:00, 7 Jan 2005 (UTC)
On the British vs English discussion - see Category talk:British composers, where a small consensus has moved the debate in the other direction. On a separate point, should we have so many entries classified as both "English musicians" and "English composers", since the second is a subcategory of the first? David Brooks 00:26, 18 Jan 2005 (UTC)
On the first point the ideal, but laborious, solution is to create sub-categories of the British category for each of the home nations, as has already occurred for many categories of British people. I have come round to this now and have been putting a lot of effort into it for various classes of British people. On the second point, the answer is a simple no, and this can be tackled over time.
Another point is that if we are to create a comprehensive menu system for all GB and NI musicians, the "English musicians" cannot be a preserve of classical musicians. Philip 19:46, 11 Feb 2005 (UTC)
I did the first on Feb 5; see Category talk:British composers. The only other effort required was to move 5 names from British, and scan the list of "English" composers for examples of Scots or Welsh (there was one, I think). It's been years since I lived in Britain, so my linguistic ear has gone out of tune: should it be "Scots composers" or "Scottish composers"?
On the second point, it should be easy enough to list the articles that are members of both, even without doing a SQL query. David Brooks 22:16, 11 Feb 2005 (UTC)
All the relevant occupational categories are called "Scottish", which I think is overwhelmingly the standard term nowadays, at least in England, and no Scottish people seem to be upset, so perhaps it is there too. I've created category:British classical musicians and will keep working on it. There are quite a few Brits in category:musicians by instrument. It is the usual Wikipedia dualism: some users thinking nationally and some by subject. All the categories will be tied together eventually. Philip 09:23, 12 Feb 2005 (UTC)