Talk:Anatoly Chubais

Archives (Index)

2012 2013 2014 2016 2017

This page is archived by ClueBot III.

Putin

BBC just stated that Chubais is the one who gave Putin his first job in the Yeltsin administration. This needs to be researched and introduced. Arminden (talk) 16:00, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

The Times has it too. It says Chubais gave Putin his first Kremlin job at the presidential property department and Chubais backed Putin’s candidacy first as prime minister and then as president, seeing in the steely-eyed former spy a man who would continue Yeltsin’s reforms, while guaranteeing his entourage immunity from prosecution in a string of swirling corruption cases.[1] Solipsism 101 (talk) 17:34, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

According to Masha Gessen in The Man Without a Face: The Unlikely Rise of Vladimir Putin, Chubais did play a significant role in Putin becoming prime minister (p21, "Chubais said [Putin] was an ideal candidate" - as a successor to Yeltsin), although Berezovsky is given the main credit, which is what Boris Berezovsky (businessman)#The Kremlin Family and Putin's rise to power also says. As for "first job in the Yeltsin administration", the closest that Gessen gets is on p16, "When Putin moved to Moscow in 1996 to take an administrative job at the Kremlin, ...", without saying who specifically "gave Putin the administrative job". Boud (talk) 19:31, 23 March 2022 (UTC) In other words, Gessen agrees (in this book) with The Times that Chubais played a significant role in Putin's rise to power, though he was not the only key person. Berezovsky mistakenly assumed, per Gessen, that "Putin, being apparently devoid of personality and personal interest, would be both malleable and disciplined". Boud (talk) 19:37, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

Only indirectly connected: Solipsism 101, hi, that was a slip, there was an "edit conflict" and I tried hard to save my edits WITHOUT harming other people's, but I must have missed this one. I most certainly find it a notable and relevant comment, thank you for putting it back in - sorry for the mistake. Cheers, Arminden (talk) 21:51, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

International "portrait" of Personality.

Each of the prominente.

Be it a multi-billionaire or a Sultan. The President of the country's government or King. Worthy. International Portrait. On the Internet pages. Eventuel, in the Wikipedia discussion. Features of character, mentality, behavior and / or manieremanagement. Noticeable, attention-grabbing features. Based on material from various media. In different languages of the world. Wikipedia article. Wide and comprehensive material.

So much! What can't be "face "?Armoenden (talk) 11:46, 18 September 2023 (UTC)

Yes, indeed.

Much in common. With Vladimir Vladimirovich.

Knight ! Knight's order. Knight - without fear and reproach.

Assassination attempts?!

[1st class Active State Councillor of the Russian Federation]

more similar with Fake "fear". Key word for understanding:

“I know...”

A certain acting talent is one of the prerequisites for this...P37307Nr.2 (talk) 16:26, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

Not quite accurate

"During this period, he was a key figure in introducing a market economy and the principles of private ownership to Russia after the fall of the Soviet Union."

This sentence should be ".... key figure in re-introducing a market economy ...." because that existed before the Revolution. While land had belonged to the Tsar, what was on the land was private property before the Revolution. Today we have oligarchs, then it was the nobility who owned the businesses. There was private business (e.g. Mamontov) but the nobility did not really like that competition, which is why Witte did not succeed with attracting enough investment.

The situation in Tsarist Russia was very much like Dickensian circumstances in Britain, where polarisation and mass poverty ruled. State owned organisations were to deliver more transparency and equality but the investor groups did not like that and therefore privatisations have been championed everywhere. Whether your captains of industry are nobility, oligarchs, billionaire entrepreneurs or some employees of state-owned enterprises, there is a cycle where privatisations cause polarisations, change to state run seeks to address it and then one goes back to privatisations. 2001:8003:A070:7F00:C90D:14C3:6C12:9EFB (talk) 05:21, 24 March 2022 (UTC)

Fine .

What about dates of birth? Among celebrities. It became possible. buy a new date of birth from Wikipedia.org

Good for sale. Year of "the Bull ". Not a bad year. Money "Goat" (people born in the year of "the Goat" are lucky in finance), etc.91.183.159.198 (talk) 15:12, 11 September 2023 (UTC)

Net worth

I'm trying to find Chubais's net worth for the article as evidence he is not an oligarch. Bloomberg has him listed as not an oligarch in this article and sources I have found, and not willing to use as citations, has his net worth ranging from US$5 million to US$25 million. Anyone have any luck? --P37307 (talk) 17:20, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

Do you take it? To anyone. Suitable aphorism:

"чюдчик - чюбчик  !

Кучерявый . Да .

Ты , не вейся на ветру .

Эх !

Карман ! Карман , ты , мой . Дырявый .

Да . Ты, не нравишься . Ненравишься вору ."91.183.159.198 (talk) 15:02, 11 September 2023 (UTC)

si-si !

Many - many years ago.

Wikipedia – online encyclopedia. Presented to Mr. Chubais, - as a multi-billionaire. With a big letters - “M”.

Personal capital - more than $100,000,000,000. usd.P37307Nr.2 (talk) 16:14, 16 April 2024 (UTC)