Wikipedia talk:Two-tier system

anon doesn't think we should take Maureen's ideas seriously

You do not seem to have expressed a neutral attitude on your other edits in wikipedia

I have been noticing your political edits all over Occupation of Iraq article – These edits do not seem in any way to contribute towards the knowledge on the subject in a neutral many but seem to be deliberate avts of vandalism in support in support of US policy in Iraq. For instance you remove all references to US soldiers committing atrocities in Iraq and Civilian deaths. You have removed all references that the war was illegal even though the UN declared the war illegal – We only quoted from the UN Gen assembly - you have even removed the words of the UN secretary Gen on Iraq.... You have removed references from a dozen newspapers that report on the occupation of Iraq as that puts the US in a poor light.

The newspaper you work for The News & Observer is a rabidly pro American occupation of Iraq mouthpiece undistinguishble from its content from Fox News – But let me remind you this is Wikipedia not some silly Southern Rag.

OK! OK!!! You are a American and JUST love your country GOD Bless America and all that..- If you love your country so much re join the marines or something and toddle off somewhere in the world to find some people to fire on.

But you know the rest of the world has a point of view as well along with many Iraqi people who visit this page which now shows signs of your grubby deletions in favour of your country all over it.

Goodall

I find the above to be abominable, and while I don't know Maureen, I find her rather likable after reading such a dispicable attack. [[User:Sam Spade|Vote Sam Spade for Arbiter!]] 17:40, 17 Nov 2004 (UTC)