Talk:The Randi Rhodes Show

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Radio, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Radio-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RadioWikipedia:WikiProject RadioTemplate:WikiProject RadioRadio articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

To-do List:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Create: Missing years and articles in radio, National Association of Radio Distress-Signalling and Infocommunications (Hungary)
Assess : Unassessed Radio articles; Unknown-importance Radio articles
Cleanup : Radio articles needing attention
Expand : Midweek Politics Bob Crane
Maintain : Portal:Radio
Stubs : Expand: Radio stubs
Verify : Unreferenced BLPs
Other : Collaboration of the Week:
Requests for Radio peer review:

Just a thought

Please stop adding Fox News style "someone said that..." type one-liners that attack randi to this wikipedia entry. Quite frankly, it's dumb. If you want to write an section for this article, then go ahead and write a section critiqueing randi all you want. I'll write another section that explains why the 1st is all lies, we can leave them both in there. But inserting one-liners like that is pointless and a waste of time.

Sirius Satellite Radio

Her show is also broadcasted on Sirius Satellite Radio. How do we work that into the table? RickK 66.60.159.190 19:47, 9 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Affiliates

I'm pretty sure that the affiliates table is out of date. Should it be deleted, or will somebody take the time to update all of the stations that now carry Randi's program?

Is the detail necessary?

Do others feel that there is too much detail with limited value in this article? Let me say that I've never heard the show (I don't live in the US) but I wonder whether the world is interested in details such as who are the bit players. Much of this content seems more appropriate for a website dedicated to the show as opposed to this encyclopedia. Thoughts? My vote is to retain the article but remove much of the content. Thanks, Hu Gadarn 16:13, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Check the first footnote. It is wrong

Check the link on the first footnote. It states she ranks 13 on the Talkers list but if you go to the link she is actually #40????