User talk:Brholden

Hello! Brholden 20:53, 12 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

College Football Project

Hello, I noticed that you have edited a College football related article. You may be interested to know that there is a college football WikiProject which you can join if you like. We would love to have you! --Mecu 01:59, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and welcome to the College football Wikiproject! We are a group of editors who love college football and work to improve Wikipedia's coverage of this sport.

There are a variety of interesting things to do within the project; you're free to participate however much—or little—you like:

Starting some new articles? Please add {{WikiProject College football}} to the talk page and list your new article in the new articles section.
Looking for somewhere to help? Please see our article to do list or project to do list

If you have any ideas you would like to share or if there is any way your fellow college football fans can help you, please feel free to ask on the project talk page.

--Mecu 20:43, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

USS Izard (DD-589)

Hi. You changed "On 18 December 1944, she was caught in the Typhoon of 1944, but survived." to the less specific "At one point, she sailed through the eyewall of a Pacific storm that had 50 knot winds." Was the storm misidentified?
—wwoods 17:38, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes thanks, my father was a quartermaster on the Izard (and is now 80 years old). I had queried him earlier about the typhoon that he had said they were in and so had earlier added the mention of it. We got together this weekend to see "Flags of Our Fathers", the movie about the Battle of Iwo Jima that the Izard was a part of. The movie spurred his recollection of various details. He had also been to an Izard crew reunion recently in Ohio. As part of this discussion, I asked him about the typhoon. He said that it was not the typhoon that had sunk the ships, but instead was a smaller storm with 50 knot winds that they had sailed through the eye of. He was unclear on the date. He also recalled the detail that he had joined the Izard in mid-late March at Pearl, so I added that detail. Brholden 18:59, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fisk Johnson

Thanks for the help getting something quick and dirty up on Fisk Johnson. Do you know how to get his birthplace, year and the years of his degres? TonyTheTiger 00:17, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome - I was surprised that the article was just a stub given that he is on the Forbes 400 list. The dates of his degrees are listed in the press release at: http://www.scjohnson.com/family/fam_pre_pre_news.asp?art_id=151 His age and "hometown" are listed in the Forbes 400 link - you could put his birthdate as "circa 1958". He should also go on the Cornell people page given that he is an emeritus trustee and a CEO. Brholden 00:26, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

SC Johnson Brands

I have editted Wikipedia:Categories_for_deletion/Log/2006_November_28#Category:S.C._Johnson_brands to make the debate decision clear. Now how does one actually get the category moved. TonyTheTiger 17:53, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Moving the category is easy, you just change all of entries one by one to the new name and add a new category. I assume (but don't know) that one of the admins will actually remove the old category entry once the change is done. However it could also be left pointing to the new one. As I said in the entry, while I have a preference for "SC", I am OK with any of the three choices ("S.C.", "S. C.", or "SC") - since there wasn't a clear consensus on the discussion and no entrenched positions, go ahead and choose your favorite. Brholden 20:08, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Flagrant foul

I see you have done quite a bit of sports editting. Would you take a look at a stub I wrote for Flagrant fouls. TonyTheTiger 17:53, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nice page - I trimmed it up and generalized it to other sports. Brholden 20:08, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

SAP Open

Thanks for helping me with the SAP Open. Greenhitsuper

You are welcome - thanks for all of your entries as well. The page was pitifully small before! The tournament has an historic past which seems to have been almost lost. Brholden 22:11, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes it did look a bit small, how did you get all the information before 1970 tho. Greenhitsuper

By searching in the archives of the New York Times. They have their whole record back to 1851. Regular subscribers get to see 100 old articles per month. I put the links to the abstracts of the articles at the bottom. Brholden 22:32, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Is it ok if you let me do the men's doubles please because i can do them up to 1970. Greenhitsuper

Sounds great (no need to ask!) - also I notice that the 1972 men's singles is missing, if you have it Brholden 22:51, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I can't find any information about the 1972 championships anywhere. Greenhitsuper

Found it in the NYT archive, it was in Albany, CA that year for some reason and Conners beat Tanner. Brholden 22:59, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Who will be editing the page. Greenhitsuper

Thanks for editing the 1972 men's singles championship. Greenhitsuper

Nice work for doing most of the SAP Open, with part of it done with me. Greenhitsuper

Thanks and thanks for your help - it has been a treat reading the old NYT articles Brholden 21:16, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

N56

I am always on the look-out for roads editors! I see you added the N56; could you do an article on it?! Regards (Sarah777 09:59, 2 June 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Sure - I've been working on quite a few Donegal topics. Brholden 16:14, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

MLB Hall of fame

Please see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Templates_for_deletion#Template:MLB_HoF for the reason I removed them all. It's perfectly valid. Soxrock June 20, 2007

DYK

Did you know? was updated. On 21 November, 2007, a fact from the article Herbert A. Collins, which you recently nominated, was featured in that section on the Main Page. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Zzyzx11 (Talk) 04:27, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

On 23 November, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Justus Henry Nelson, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--WjBscribe 17:13, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Jeremiah Evarts Book Cover John A Andrew III.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Jeremiah Evarts Book Cover John A Andrew III.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 18:23, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I added the two templates as you suggested. Thanks, Brholden (talk) 05:09, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject College football September 2008 Newsletter

The September 2008 issue of the College football WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:35, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Arno B. Cammerer

Thanks for cleaning up Arno B. Cammerer. People tend to think that I want all unreferenced articles claiming no notability to be deleted . . . in fact, I only want all unattended unreferenced articles claiming no notability to be deleted, and much prefer it when someone conscientious like you does some work on it. I tend to spend considerably more effort on identifying problems than fixing them, but that approach is of very limited use without people like you. Cheers. Bongomatic (talk) 04:15, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Brholden (talk) 04:16, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject College football October 2008 Newsletter

The October 2008 issue of the College football WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:58, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject College football December 2008 Newsletter

The December 2008 issue of the College football WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
Automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:41, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject College football January 2009 Newsletter

The January 2009 issue of the College football WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:32, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject College football February 2009 Newsletter

The February 2009 issue of the College football WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 01:49, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Metaphorical crocus

You added:

"The financial community sometimes refers to companies or economic sectors that rise early after an economic downturn as "Crocuses" in reference to the flower's ability to thrive in the late winter or early spring."

A footnote quote to a published usage wouls make this new statement firmer.--Wetman (talk) 19:01, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done, Thanks Brholden (talk) 03:35, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. --Wetman (talk) 04:00, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

College Football Project request

Hello! You are listed as an active member of the College Football Project! We have a large number of unreferenced biographies of living persons, but it works out to be just two or three articles per active participant. I've divided up the articles that need help and put them in a table on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject College football/Unreferenced BLPs. Please assist the project by researching and sourcing the articles that have been "assigned" (so to speak) to you.--Paul McDonald (talk) 02:38, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:ElbridgeGLaphamUSSenNY.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:ElbridgeGLaphamUSSenNY.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:12, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed - it already had the bioguide reference showing that it came from a public domain source, but I put into the proper form.

File:ElbridgeGLaphamUSSenNY.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:ElbridgeGLaphamUSSenNY.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. FASTILY_s ^(TALK) 08:28, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Master Genealogist

Nicely done on the editing on The Master Genealogist W4chris (talk) 23:33, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks - it needed work. Brholden (talk) 20:43, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mountain View Alliance for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mountain View Alliance is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mountain View Alliance until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Lesser Cartographies (talk) 20:27, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:Charles E. Woodworth Portrait.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:19, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:54, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of FRF.12

The article FRF.12 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (software) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back. Thank you. This proposed deletion was started by User:Piotrus

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Fayenatic London 14:11, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Causeway Carriage for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Causeway Carriage is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Causeway Carriage until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Joeykai (talk) 05:05, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks - I put the non-overlapping info from the Carriage's page onto the game's page, so the article is ready to be be deleted Brholden 3 October 2016

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Brholden. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of OnStream Networks for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article OnStream Networks is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OnStream Networks until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mr. Guye (talk) 03:25, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Optical Internetworking Forum, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Polarization. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:08, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve FlexE

Hi, I'm Elliot321. Brholden, thanks for creating FlexE!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This page is written like an advertisement.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Elliot321 (talk) 23:39, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Brholden. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Better source request for File:James D. Phelan US Senator from CA.jpg

Thanks for your upload to Wikipedia:

File:James D. Phelan US Senator from CA.jpg

You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain, search engine, pinboard, aggregator, or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:45, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks - I added the info from the caption of the photo in the bioguide which lists it as Library of Congress Brholden 29 October 2018

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Brholden. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:James D. Phelan US Senator from CA.jpg

The file File:James D. Phelan US Senator from CA.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

August Kutzbock

Way back on 4 December 2007, you added information to the article on Evansville, Wisconsin, naming August Kutzbock as the architect or designer of the Evansville Seminary. I have recently been making additions to the August Kutzbock category page in Wikimedia, including the Seminary. But now I've noticed that an online article about the Seminary doesn't mention Kutzbock and names other individuals as the designers and builders. <http://evansvillehistory.net/EvansvilleSeminary.html> says this about the original red-brick building (1856-57): "Only a few of those who worked on the building were named in histories of the school. Jacob West's son, James R. West designed the building and also served as a carpenter. James West and George Murphy installed the first floor timbers, made the doors and window frames. Alan S. Baker, who would later become a prominent manufacturer, sawed the decorative brackets that supported the over-hanging eaves of the building. Baker was paid three dollars a month and his board as compensation for his work." And about the cream-brick addition (built 20 years after Kutzbock's 1868 death), it states: "By 1888, the funds had been raised and a white brick building was constructed. William Libby was the carpenter-contractor. Libby's sons worked on the project with their father. Isaac Brink did the mason work." Any additional information you could provide on the Kutzbock attribution would be much appreciated! --Jdsteakley (talk) 09:39, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I don't have more info on this. Brholden

Speedy deletion nomination of Malleable Technologies

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Malleable Technologies requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 09:10, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:19, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Susana Boomhouwer for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Susana Boomhouwer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Susana Boomhouwer until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Bbarmadillo (talk) 17:38, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

COI warning

Hello, Brholden. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Susana Boomhouwer, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. --Bbarmadillo (talk) 18:31, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Give me a break. I'm just a fan.

Orphaned non-free image File:Susana - Press Play Vol. 3 - Cover - LoRes.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Susana - Press Play Vol. 3 - Cover - LoRes.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:47, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Susana, Brave, Cover Art, LoRes.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Susana, Brave, Cover Art, LoRes.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:48, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Susana, Closer, Cover, LoRes.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Susana, Closer, Cover, LoRes.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:49, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:06, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of New England Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. Woodworth

The article New England Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. Woodworth has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

non notable case

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jax 0677 (talk) 20:53, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, There are basically no non-notable SCOTUS cases. SCOTUS rulings are central to American Jurisprudence. There should be a page about every SCOTUS case in the entire history of the US. There aren't that many per year and there there are only 240 years or so. It is ridiculous to delete a reasonably well written yet starter page for one of these cases. Can it be improved, sure but don't delete it. That would be completely going in the wrong direction. Brholden (talk) 23:42, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Next at the Kennedy Center moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Next at the Kennedy Center, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:28, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Next at the Kennedy Center (August 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tutwakhamoe was:

The "Critical Reception" part relies too heavily on direct quotes. Consider only quoting some adjectives, phrases or short sentences that best represent the cited reviews, then summarize some other important points from the reviews.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Next at the Kennedy Center and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tutwakhamoe (talk) 02:23, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Brholden! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Tutwakhamoe (talk) 02:23, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Next at the Kennedy Center has been accepted

Next at the Kennedy Center, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

S0091 (talk) 17:34, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]