User talk:HenkvD

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome! -- [[User:MacGyverMagic|Mgm|^(talk)]] 21:25, Nov 25, 2004 (UTC)

eerste nl.wikimedia.org ontmoeting

ik zou iedereen graag willen uitnodigen te overwegen of zij een rol willen en/of kunnen spelen in de oprichting van een nederlandse wikimedia-organisatie. een eerste ontmoeting wordt momenteel georganiseerd, zie daarvoor hier, op de nl.wikimedia.org wiki. er zijn nog vele stappen te nemen, en meer wikianen nodig, om e.e.a. op verantwoorde wijze verder te ontwikkelen. R adiant _>|< 10:50, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)

Sisterlinks

Hoi, misschien is het handiger om {{sisterlinkswp}} op Template:PortalPage te plaatsen. --R.Koot 19:28, 30 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Growth

You are right, the growth of wikipedia is logistic... However, I made some calculations and I found that the maximum rate of growth of wikipedia was reached in August, 2006. I have to find some time to make the graphics and a good report Diego Torquemada 15:38, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for checking my logistic model. The maximum rate of growth might well be a few months sooner as I said because I used 6 months averages. HenkvD 19:54, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi HenkvD, please check my disscusion page Diego Torquemada 13:42, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ad Konings

I was glad to see that the Nederland version of Wikipedia already had an article on Konings. It was embarrassing when I saw there was none in English. Thanks for linking to my article! Pseudospecialops 19:15, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

defaultsort is a magic word, not a template

No big deal, but please use DEFAULTSORT:x,y rather than DEFAULTSORT|x.y. Thanks. :-)Flatterworld 14:39, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. It works with '|', I noticed that ':' was used as well and wondered how that would work for a template. I will use ':' instead. HenkvD 16:52, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Joan Geelvinck

Het gaat niet om dezelfde Joan Geelvinck, blijkbaar ga je alleen op de naam af en niet op de inhoud.
It is not the same Joan Geelvinck as in the Dutch Wikipedia. Taksen 16:28, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies. Ik controleer zowel op naam als op inhoud. Bij personen ga ik vooral af op de gebooredatum. In dit geval stond er geen datum bij Joan Geelvinck en ging ik te snel af op een aantal globale termen zoals vroedschap en Amsterdam. Ik heb het inmiddels teruggedraaid. HenkvD 16:57, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Ase nine ^(talk)^(contribs) 15:53, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This message, probably about Blood Trails, is probably meant for User talk:206.75.48.246. HenkvD (talk) 13:14, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Whoops. Thanks for the heads-up. Ase nine ^(talk)^(contribs) 15:53, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Xavier Oriach

You say : "In 1991 Oriach moved again, this time to Normandy, where several retrospectives of his work have been organized; he also shows regularly in his native Catalonia." In fact, he lives already in Normandy but begins to go half the year in Catalogne (Sabadell). Thank you for the translation, excusez-moi de mon anglais et merci de vous intéresser à ce peintre digne d'intérêt. User: Michel-georges bernard, 29.01.2008, 21.43

This text in the acticle is not of mine. It is probably from User:AlbertHerring. HenkvD (talk) 18:57, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Anne Dietrich merged with Annegret Dietrich

I merged the Anne Dietrich article in with the Annegret Dietrich article with both FIBT profiles listed if you wish to have a look. Chris (talk) 23:08, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ooops

thank you for correcting my stupid mistake.-- ExpImp^talkcon 19:37, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Added WP extended-growth model

15-April-2009: As you suggested, I have updated Wikipedia:Modelling Wikipedia's growth to mention the various models, adding new section "Extended-growth model". The current daily growth rate has subsided from March, so I projected the 3-million-article mark will occur in mid-August 2009, probably on August 14. -Wikid77 (talk) 06:31, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

talkback

Hello, HenkvD. You have new messages at Yaan's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Added new section to the growth modelling page

Hi, I have added a new section to the page Wikipedia:Modelling Wikipedia's growth, with an improved model for the observed growth rate. It also icludes a seasonal modulation factor that seems to account for 1/2 of the "random" fluctuations in the growth rate since 2006. I hope it makes sense. All the best, --Jorge Stolfi (talk) 06:37, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the comments.
Ten parameters do sound like a lot, but it is actually only 2 for the bulk of each phase (without the seasonal factor). That is a straight line in the log plot of N´. If you subtract the straight line, the residual has no trend (except for the seasonal fluctuation), at least to my eyes.
The seasonal factor too is only another 2+epsilon parameters: the amplitude and delay are real numbers, but the frequency is only one bit (the justifiable choices were only 1 or 2).
As for the limit L, the correct figure is 5.9 million. 8 million was a mistake (I used R2 in months^-1 rather than days^-1). One more thing to fix in the tech report...
As for future numbers, I merely computed the limit as explained in the tech report. Running the model for the future is trivial, but I am traveling at the moment and cannot do it now. Will have to wait until thursday.
All the best, --Jorge Stolfi (talk) 02:02, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia four million

Yep I think you'll win this, I'd change my estimate to March 2012 now if I could. I stupidly based my estimate on the 2-3 million growth rate and failed to take into account a slowing rate in new article creation. I seriously doubt we'll reach 4 million in 2011 now.... Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 16:10, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

So try your next chance on Wikipedia:Five-million pool (2). HenkvD (talk) 17:27, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Edit test cleanup bot

Hi there. I have started a discussion at the Village Pump regarding a proposed bot that would clean up the "example"-type edit tests discussed in edit filter discussion you initiated. Your input is invited! 28bytes (talk) 17:30, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Ordina Open

Category:Ordina Open, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. jorgenev 03:00, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bug GeoTemplate

Well done, Henk. I linked your contribution at Meta in the Forum. Happy New Year! Cheers, 12:44, 29 December 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by ZeaForUs (talk • contribs)

Template:Sisterlinkswp listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Template:Sisterlinkswp. Since you had some involvement with the Template:Sisterlinkswp redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). MGA73 (talk) 21:01, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A possible refinement to the Gompertz model

As an experiment, I've tried adding a small exponential term to the Gompertz model: see Wikipedia:Modelling Wikipedia's growth#A possible refinement. It gives a remarkably good fit to the data from 2005 onwards. Whether this reflects the underlying dynamics, or is simply a deomstration that you can fit almost any model to anything with sufficient model parameters, is an interesting question. -- The Anome (talk) 11:05, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't got good like-for-like stats for recent periods (the recent statistics summary tables at http://stats.wikimedia.org/EN/TablesWikipediaDE.htm don't seem to match the dewiki article counter), but I've parsed, resampled, and fitted the data from de:Wikipedia:Meilensteine and posted it to my talk page here (graph here, parameters in the image comment, data set here).

I've also regenerated the prediction, this time without resampling the input data, with real dates instead of fractional years since 2000-01-01, here.

The fit seems almost too perfect to be true -- even capturing the small undulation and inflection point around 2007 -- making me suspect overfitting, but if this is real, the model seems highly effective.

I'd greatly appreciate it if you could try to replicate this, just to check my working.

Now I need a source of good comparable stats for all the Wikipedia editions. -- The Anome (talk) 19:15, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wieringerrandmeer

Hello HenkvD

Sorry I don't speak Dutch and I'm trying to translate an article from the dutch, concerning the Wieringerrandmeer project. I don't know if this is going to be realised. On november 3rd 2010 the state of Hollande-Noord decided something, but I cannot understand what. If you have time could you tell me what it is ? Or if you speak french, there is a question mark on sentences I cannot understand. (no english page yet) Best regards.

--Laurentleap (talk) 21:02, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

"Op 3 november 2010 maakte Gedeputeerde Staten van de Provincie Noord-Holland bekend het hele project te willen afblazen wegens het niet rond krijgen van de financiën. Op 15 november besloot Provinciale Staten over het initiatief van GS."

this translates as: on november 3rd the Gedeputeerde staten of the province North Holland anounced to cancel the project because of financial reasons. On november 15th the States-Provincial decided accordingly.

HenkvD (talk) 07:20, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for your answer. I have changed the french article accordingly.--Laurentleap (talk) 19:48, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

5 million pool

Hi. I understand you came to the decision that 80% the way there was the criteria for closing it but don't you think its a little premature? Especially as we have just passed 4 million a lot of people myself included will like to have a fun guess of when we hit 5 million. Could you consider reopening it for a few more weeks?♦ Dr. Blofeld 19:12, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, HenkvD. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, HenkvD. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, HenkvD. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

List of protected buildings in Sint Eustatius

Hi there, I was wondering if you could tell me the source used to create this list? I would like to add it to the article so I can remove the unsourced tag, but I can't find it anywhere online. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 15:20, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Premeditated Chaos: cc @Ciell:: This list is from an e-mail of Walter Hellebrand dated 27 augustus 2017 om 22:50 to the duch chapeter Wikimedia-Nederland. HenkvD (talk) 15:31, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ahh. Any idea where he got it from? ♠PMC♠ (talk) 15:33, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Walter Hellebrand is St. Eustatius’ Monuments Director. [1]

Gotcha. I wonder if it's possible for him to publish the list online somewhere reliable? I'm not sure we can properly keep the list simply based on an otherwise unpublished email, per WP:V. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 16:00, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:19, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]