Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Horrifed Observers of Pedestrian Entertainment
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE. Carbonite | Talk 14:02, 20 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Non-notable: a google search [1] produce wikipedia and clone disambiguation at HOPE and one blog. --Henrygb 01:24, 5 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- It's blog (at http://www.hopeinamerica.blogspot.com/), Delete unless notability and relevance demonstrated. RJFJR 02:02, Mar 5, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, not notable. Megan1967 02:29, 5 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, not notable. ComCat 02:40, 5 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Delete: Wikipedia is not a web guide, and web guides are not blog guides. Geogre 02:52, 5 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. This group did briefly receive international press coverage thanks to provocative press releases, but their 15 minutes came and went without making any real impact. Their much-publicized CD exchange program managed "hundreds" (by their own accounting) of responses after said exposure, even after the program was expanded to cover dozens of recording acts. --iMb~Mw 07:33, 5 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Delete Only 7 Google hits for the full name, not good for something that seems mostly Internet-based. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 12:59, Mar 8, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete This page is more like an advert! Who are they anyway?
- (Above from 206.17.143.136) --iMb~Mw 05:29, 19 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Moved from top:
A yahoo search reveals over 1000 pages making note. They were also featured in an AP article as recently as last week. The mis-spellings seem to be the larger problem.
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.