Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/How to tell if your child is a hacker
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was SPEEDY. jni 15:13, 26 Feb 2005 (UTC)
All I can say is, wtf? -- Riffsyphon1024 22:29, 19 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- This is a repost of an Adequacy troll. Speedy deleting. silsor 22:31, Feb 19, 2005 (UTC)
- What is the name of this article? Vellocet Malchickawick 27:36, Feb 19, 2005 (EST)
- If you're smart enough to copy and paste the article into Wikipedia I'm sure you can figure it out. Please check the giant copyright warnings at the bottom of every edit page. silsor 22:37, Feb 19, 2005 (UTC)
- Ah, I see your point. Although I do, I'm just wondering: since this is an open letter then why does it violate copyright laws? (sorry to be a dumbass) Vellocet Malchickawick 27:39, Feb 19, 2005 (EST)
- It's not an open letter. silsor 22:42, Feb 19, 2005 (UTC)
- Ah, I see your point. Although I do, I'm just wondering: since this is an open letter then why does it violate copyright laws? (sorry to be a dumbass) Vellocet Malchickawick 27:39, Feb 19, 2005 (EST)
- If you're smart enough to copy and paste the article into Wikipedia I'm sure you can figure it out. Please check the giant copyright warnings at the bottom of every edit page. silsor 22:37, Feb 19, 2005 (UTC)
- What is the name of this article? Vellocet Malchickawick 27:36, Feb 19, 2005 (EST)
- I agree with Silsor. Adequacy articles aren't encyclopedia articles. I guess a um... YHBT is in order. Rhobite 23:04, Feb 19, 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.