User talk:Huger

Hey. Where did you get images like Image:Winona.jpg? We controversially do allow fair use images but a very basic requirement of fair use is to give credit to the photographer. Otherwise the use cannot at all be considered fair. Please at least provide this information. --mav 04:20 8 Jul 2003 (UTC)

Also Image:Penelop.JPG. —seav 04:38 8 Jul 2003 (UTC)

I've placed all the photos you uploaded on Articles for deletion. If you cannot at least give credit to each photo then they will be deleted in one week. --mav

You could do a Google image search and may get lucky and find the photo and its original source. Then you have your cite and external link. :-) --mav

Hello there, welcome to the 'pedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you need pointers on how we title pages visit Wikipedia:Naming conventions or how to format them visit our manual of style. If you have any other questions about the project then check out Wikipedia:Help or add a question to the Village pump. Cheers! --maveric149

Hi. You uploaded Image:Rumelihisari.jpg but did not list any source and/or copyright information on the image description page. Please mark it either as GFDL or public domain. See Wikipedia:Image_copyright_tags for more info. Please note that images without copyright information may be deleted in the future. Thanks.

Image tagging for Image:Anadoluhisari.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Anadoluhisari.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:14, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Tuba Altıntop

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Tuba Altıntop, by Pd THOR (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Tuba Altıntop seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Tuba Altıntop, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Tuba Altıntop itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 21:04, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Rafet El Roman

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Rafet El Roman, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Magioladitis (talk) 02:03, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kerim Tekin for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kerim Tekin is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kerim Tekin (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Agricola44 (talk) 17:23, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]