Talk:International auxiliary language

Business High‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Constructed languages B‑class Top‑importance

	Constructed languages portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Constructed languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of constructed languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Constructed languagesWikipedia:WikiProject Constructed languagesTemplate:WikiProject Constructed languagesconstructed language articles
B	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Globalization High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Globalization, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Globalization on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.GlobalizationWikipedia:WikiProject GlobalizationTemplate:WikiProject GlobalizationGlobalization articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

International relations High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Linguistics: Applied Linguistics High‑importance

	Linguistics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Applied Linguistics Task Force.

Trade High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trade, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Trade on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TradeWikipedia:WikiProject TradeTemplate:WikiProject TradeTrade articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archives

Archive 1

Archive 2

This page has archives. Sections older than 900 days may be automatically archived by when more than 4 sections are present.

Worldlang

Since I can't respond to the deletion message directly, and the talk page is gone:

02:17, 28 December 2017 Fastily talk contribs deleted page Worldlang (Expired PROD, concern was: title of article is a bogus nonce-word per talk)

Worldlang is clearly not a nonce word, let alone bogus; like several other coinages in -lang, it is in regular use among language construction enthusiasts (conlangers), especially the auxlang/IAL community – it's also covered over at Wiktionary, where it is not marked as a nonce word. A web search using the terms "worldlang" "conlang" or "worldlang" "auxlang" pulls up discussions on Reddit and specialised mailing lists and web forums, and for instance this glossary. Whether this (technical/jargon) term deserves an article of its own on Wikipedia is a separate issue (it's a term limited to a hobbyist community, not used in a professional community, but that's not the decisive criterion, coverage in RS is; hence we have articles about fanfic terms, for example), and my comment isn't intended to weigh on that question, but the rationale given above is clearly nonsense and bogus itself. --Florian Blaschke (talk) 13:20, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

not languages according to most linguists

Apparently linguists now understand that Esperanto and other international auxiliary languages are not languages but parasitic systems based on real languages: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C09jMAH6X18&feature=youtu.be&t=1231 at 20'30" and 22'30". --Espoo (talk) 11:38, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Linguists now understand" no such thing. Chomsky is one linguist, the one linguist that non-linguists are most likely to have heard of, and his theories and systems are far from being universally accepted in the linguistic community. --Thnidu (talk) 05:05, 15 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Since he claims that linguists agree on this, it is extremely unlikely that only a small number of linguists agree on this. And even in that case, this has to be reported here. --Espoo (talk) 07:27, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Since he claims that linguists agree on this, it is extremely unlikely that only a small number of linguists agree on this." I really don't think you can infer that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.30.116.63 (talk) 22:32, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It probably is all moot and discredited now. Stop. AnotherEditor144^{talk contribs} 17:28, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mario Pei

@Pstudier: Why did you unlink Mario Pei just after linking him? He has an article and is certainly prominent enough to deserve it. Thnidu (talk) 07:32, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I was having computer problems, and thought it better just to revert rather than risk messing things up. Go ahead and link if you wish. Paul Studier (talk) 22:03, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I found my problem. The instance of Mario Pei that I linked was hidden inside a reference and not visible in the main part of the article. Now fixed. Paul Studier (talk) 22:15, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

LEDE image

I don't think having the current Countries_with_English_as_Official_Language.png map on the LEDE is a good idea, I couldn't find the source data that was used to create it, and the map doesn't explains what the difference between unofficial vs not official is. Uwsi (talk) 05:10, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]