This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
Wouldn't U-691 be a better title of this page? "Unterseeboot" is German, not English and is not used very often in English at all (and we do have a pesky naming convention on the use of English words). Simply saying "U-Number" is the most common usage and I don't see any ambiguity in using that format. I just hit preview, and of course the far more common U format isn't even a redirect here. Remember, one of the central ideas of our naming conventions is to preserve easy linking so long as ambiguity issues are not a problem. I just did a quick check, and most of the links to the U-boat articles are obscured like so [[Unterseeboot 691|U-691]]. Why not just have the article live at U-691? --maveric149
In a word, ambiguity issues. Is U-238 an isotope or a submarine? Is U-2 a boat, a band, or a submarine? Furthermore, the Wikipedia naming standard calls for spelling out acronyms unless the original meaning has been largely forgotten (eg, laser). The ship naming standard calls for spelling out "Unterseeboot." And finally, I've been creating Unterseeboot articles for a long time now and don't feel like changing. ;-> --the Epopt
I don't say this often, but you convinced me right away. :) However, redirects for the less ambiguous ones would be nice. --maveric149
.jpg)
