Jump to content

Talk:Tammuz (mythology)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

This page links to

https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dumuzi

in the German version. However, the German entry doesn't link back to this one. Instead, another entry is linking here:

https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tammuz_%28Mythologie%29

I'm not at all qualified to say which one is correct, but they seem to talk about different entities, so someone should check that — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.230.92.18 (talk) 22:28, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Somewhere an account

[edit]

Somewhere I read an ancient writer (sailing into port?) describing some of the visual ritual of Tammuz during his time of mourning. It would give some life to this entry. Help? My old notes are a mess. Charlie Turek magician charlesturek@comcast.net 11 Nov 04

Too late now, but Charlie is recalling Robert Graves' interpretation of the "Great Pan is dead" cry heard from shipboard, recounted by Plutarch. See Pan.

Days of mourning

[edit]

I have removed the paragraphs that attempt to imply a link between Muslim and Jewish days of mourning with ancient mourning practices related to Tammuz. In both case the days of mourning were introduced as a result of known historical events having absolutely nothing to do with Tammuz. The Islamic practice arose centuries after Tammuz worship has disappeared and the Jewish practice was instituted by people well aware and totally opposed to Tammuz worship so to suggest that there is a link is a crackpot POV not supported by legitimate scholarship. Kuratowski's Ghost 15:38, 9 Nov 2004 (UTC)

A brief reference to mourning for Tammuz, mentioning other unconnected days of Ancient Near eastern mourning needs to be returned to this article. --Wetman 23:13, 10 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Isn't it similarly a 'crackpot POV' of omission to simply delete any mention of the link between Tammuz and Hebrew tradition? The 17th of Tammuz mourns, in part, Moses' destruction of the laws after the Hebrews worship the golden calf. What god the calf actually represented is a matter of debate, but it certainly shows that some Hebrews were attached to other cults. It is interesting that Tammuz was associated with a golden bull- does anyone know if the Hebrew words 'calf' and 'bull' are closely related? If they are, I'd be pretty convinced of S.N. Kramer's theory. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.174.107.159 (talk) 12:56, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tamuz will be later adopted in Judaic and Islamic traditions

[edit]


Tamuz sumerian name was Dumu-zid which means the "good child".
His akkadian name was Tamuz.
He was the King-God of the city Bad-tibira, of stables, milk and fertility.
After his death, his sister Geshtinanna cried and lamented days and nights.
The lamentations were written in the babylonian religion.
Judaic religion will retake those lamentations tradition.
note : the comments from the user "Kuratowski's Ghost" are very dangerous because he is refusing scientific facts and to read the traditions of the tablets. He removed VERY important paragraphs about jewish religion and links with Tammuz. The babylonians tablets traditions show that Geshtinanna lamented when Dumuzid died. And Inanna went to the underworld to try to save him. Thats scientific facts and the user "Kuratowski's Ghost" doesnt have the right to delete them in the wikipedia.
The given link is surely not a crackpot POV like user "Kuratowski's Ghost" is writing, it is correct : the jewish religion and calendar is DIRECTLY coming from the babylonian religion. The only difference is the name of the old gods was replaced with only one : YWHW . Denying this is denying science, and thats what the user "Kuratowski's Ghost" did.
Traduction of the babylonian tablet : http://etcsl.orinst.ox.ac.uk/cgi-bin/etcslmac.cgi?text=t.1.4.4
Extract :
"She can make the lament for you, my Dumuzid, the lament for you, the lament, the lamentation, reach the desert -- she can make it reach the house Arali; she can make it reach Bad-tibira; she can make it reach Dul-šuba; she can make it reach the shepherding country, the sheepfold of Dumuzid "
"O Dumuzid of the fair-spoken mouth, of the ever kind eyes," she sobs tearfully, "O you of the fair-spoken mouth, of the ever kind eyes," she sobs tearfully. "Lad, husband, lord, sweet as the date, …… O Dumuzid!" she sobs, she sobs tearfully.
etc.

The Hebrew calendar does come from the Babylonian calendar but to suggest that days of mourning commemorating events that have absolutely nothing to do with Tammuz are really derived from Tammuz worship is cranky. Wikipedia articles are not for presenting cranky POV. Kuratowski's Ghost 16:22, 9 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Tammuz probably does have a lot to do with the days of mourning, like it or not. Ask most main-stream religious scholars and any Near Eastern historian. One reference for you is the Sumerologist Samuel Noah Kramer in The Sumerians: Their History, Culture, and Character on pg. 208 of the 1971 edition. The only folks who don't believe the days of mourning are related to the laments for Tammuz/Dumuzid are those who, despite all evidence, believe that monotheistic religions don't borrow from earlier traditions. They do- Christians put Christmas near the winter solstice and Hebrews kept mourning for Tammuz (often represented by a golden bull in ancient Babylon). Some people, Kuratowski's Ghost possibly included, can't stand the thought that their religion ever compromised with non-believers. They did. Look on the bright side: in this case, Moses didn't like it either. That doesn't mean you should just delete any reference to it- find some lunatic who agrees with you and site him or her. Then you can say it's 'controversial'. Better yet, read more about it and discover the truth.

Kuratowski's Ghost are you really stubborn ?

[edit]




Tammuz was the brother of Geshtinanna.
The lover of Tammuz was Ishtar.
When he died, she cried and lamented days and nights.
Ishtar went to the underworld to bring Tammuz back to life.
After their death, they were divinized by the sumerians and then babylonians.
Many many Baylonian rites still survived even when Abraham brought the new religion to his semitic tribes. (like the golden Calf, the calendar based on the moon, Ishtar cult etc.)
That's the origin of the hebraic lamentations.
Ask that to rabbins or assyrologues, they know all that.
And that's why Tammuz is "evil" for the jewish religion because his cult is very ancient and goes back to sumerian days.

Kuratowski's Ghos, you are denying historical facts.

And you are a raving lunatic Kuratowski's Ghost 20:55, 5 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Just telling the story

[edit]

Wouldn't the narrative be improved if it could be told with closer attention to the recently reconstituted texts, with less smirking? --Wetman 15:00, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Details?

[edit]

The An older interpretion doesn't have enough detail. What is the "older" interpretation? What are these texts? Where were they found? -Tydaj 21:46, 10 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

It's better now, but needs further expanding. --Wetman 23:13, 10 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
I cleared up some of the meanings - but, it still lacks any real information... smIsle 05:48, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"weeping for Tammuz"

[edit]

An anonymous editor made the following irrelevant edits (bolded): "there sat women weeping for the Tammuz (alternatley "Getting the Tammuz to weep" acc. to traditional hebrew reading of the vowels in "MiVaChoT EhT Hatamuz"). Even I know that by mispointing it, any passage in Hebrew may be rendered meaningless, or given a subtle new connotation. For instance the vowels of bosheth "shameful" can render Moloch as Molech. See the etymology of Beelzebub. And "the" does not exist in the original: is it being added here to give credibility to this "traditional" misreading? This intrusion does not assist the reader in understanding Tammuz, subject of the entry, the god for whom the women were weeping. --Wetman 21:10, 10 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Tamil connection

[edit]

Is there any substantiation whatsoever for the supposed Tamil connection mentioned here? 71.82.214.160 06:59, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I HIGHLY doubt it. The zh in Tamizh is merely a orthographic convention used to represent a liquid l sound, which is absent in Indo-European languages (like English) and in Semitic languages and nowhere close to the way Tammuz is pronounced. This is just wishful thinking based on the similiarity of the words WHEN written in English

Makes you wonder, though. We know how Hebrew and Arabic are pronounced... but Tammuz has to travel quite a ways before reaching India. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.174.107.159 (talk) 13:07, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Life-Death Deity or Not

[edit]

Just compare these two excerpts from the article:

Readers in four-season temperate cultures may doubt the god as a vegetation god, through misconstruing this seasonal timing, or wishfully see in him a life-death-rebirth deity. "He was no dying and resurrecting vegetation demon, as James George Frazer wanted him to be (for one thing no vegetation demon dies in the spring, in April)," Miroslav Marcovich observed.[2] More to the point, tablets discovered in 1963 show that Dumuzi was in fact consigned to the Underworld himself, in order to secure Inanna's release.

Dumuzid/Tammuz being the god of the vegetation cycle, this corresponds to the changing of the seasons as the abundance of the earth diminishes in his absence. He is a life-death-rebirth deity.

either he's a life-death-rebirth deity or not - choose one or at least address the conflict!!

smIsle 05:31, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]


There is also an inherent contradiction here on the one side saying that Tammuz is a vegetation deity and another saying he is not. There is also some erroneous conclusions in saying that a vegetation deity precludes the concept of 'rebirth', when it is the 'rebirth' of the vegetation that is inferred. The assumption that if a god goes to the Underworld he does not return from it is a little strange considering that even Jesus is said to have visited hades and it did not preclude him rising. Add to that the erroneous assumption that 'no vegetation demon (sic)dies in spring' shows little knowledge of ancient cults in which the grain being buried in the spring planting festival was considered to be the body of the God being buried in the ground. The Osirian Festival, the Khoiak, on which there is ample research is a case in point. That Osiris and Tammuz are associated by many scholars (read what is coming out about them in the Oxford Journals) doesn't make this irrelevant to Tammuz. Osiris died the double death: in spring as the planted corn buried in the earth and in summer as the heat of the desert withered the vegetation (Set, Osiris' brother and murderer being the hot winds from the desert personified).

Tale of Two Brothers

[edit]

The section was missing ref tags and was somewhat ungrammatical, plus there's a Tale of Two Brothers, so I did some cleanup on it, but now that I look at it I see no connection to Tammuz. Could someone who knows the topic explain the connection, or remove it if there is none? --Jamoche (talk) 19:10, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've deleted it, doesn't say anything not found in Tale of Two Brothers and appears completely off topic in this article. I've also moved the Tamil stuff to a new stub article. Kuratowski's Ghost (talk) 15:28, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A call for critical review of ...

[edit]

the following books...

--124.78.214.145 (talk) 07:03, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

^^^^^
FYI

--124.78.214.145 (talk) 07:04, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

myths of babylonia and assyria by donald a. mackenzie

[edit]

The above mentioned book contains a chapter which gives a scholarly and informed description of Tammuz and as such I think more should be made of its content. For instance the author attempts a lineage describing Tammuz's family thus : "Tammuz of the Abyss was one of the members of the family of Ea, god of the Deep, whose other sons, in addition to Merodach, were Nira, an obscure deity, Ki-Gulla, 'world destroyer', Burnunta-sa, 'broad ear', and Bara and Baragulla, probably 'revealers' or 'oracles'. In addition there was a daughter, Khi-dimme-azaga, 'child of the renowned spirit'. She may have been identical with Belit-sheri, who is referred to in the Sumerian hymns as the sister of Tammuz."

There is much more, but being unfamiliar with the procedures and conventions of Wikipedia I am not sure how best to proceed. I do feel though that more should be made of the remarkable and informative book mentioned above. Gordoncom (talk) 09:19, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]


"Is the name of" in lead

[edit]

How is removing "Is the name of" from the lead violating NPOV? See WP:REFERS. WP is not a dictionary, so we focus on the topics, not the words. Ashmoo (talk) 13:25, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Tammuz (mythology). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:01, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Tammuz_(mythology)&oldid=1195691094"