Talk:1963

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Years Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Years, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Years on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YearsWikipedia:WikiProject YearsTemplate:WikiProject YearsYears articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Page layout years

There is a discussion on my talk page on page layout.

For most of the last three hundred years there is inconsistency and duplication between the year in topic paragraph, the "see also" box and what is on the year by topic pages. Prior to 1950 I am pretty convinced we can painlessly (except for sore fingers) delete all of the year in topic paragraphs and ensure that the material goes into a "see also" box, creating such a box where none exists. Post 1950, particularly from the "year in US television" link a lot of material has been added to this paragraph as highlights (sometimes making up most of the page content pointed at).

Personally I think we should still delete the paragraph, keep the box linking to the topic sites and move any particularly important parts of the year in topic paragraph to the main chronological list. This does involve undoing quite a bit of work which someone has done.

Therefore, unlike for prior to 1950 (where I've said no objection= I do it) for post 1950 I won't touch these pages unless a significant number of people agree with the change. (I am also unlikely to get the pre 1950 stuff done before summer unless the service speed improves dramatically). (talk)--BozMo 14:16, 7 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

Neneh Cherry

is listed on her page as being born in 1964. Anyone?

September 24 1963

What is this? : September 24 - Niver de Meu Pai. Why does my five dollar bill have a red serial number and a red stamp?

Stormy weather

IIRC, Timetables of History says a 'phoon in the Indian Ocean hit Bangladesh, causing 22000 deaths. I don't see it here... TREKphiler ^{hit me ♠} 17:44, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fix links to countries

In the "By topic" side-box, several of the country links are red; this ought to be fixed. Brauden (talk) 22:39, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Assassination of John F. Kennedy

To say that it is disputed that Lee Harvey Oswald shot John Kennedy or J.D. Tippit is putting it very mildly indeed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wyjohnson (talk • contribs) 01:24, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

GaitskellMP.jpg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 19:36, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

GaitskellMP.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 11:23, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

1963 eruption of Mount Agung

The 1963 eruption of Mount Agung, which killed at least 1500 people, should be included on this page somewhere, I feel. 17 March is listed as the main explosive eruption event. Eruptions of Mount Agung gaidheal1 ^{(talk♫contribs)} 18:01, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Martin Vizcarra (Presidential Portrait) (cropped).jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 22:13, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

Martin Vizcarra (Presidential Portrait) (cropped).jpg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 11:40, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Anthony Albanese portrait.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 20:07, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Collage

A collage was included, apparently without discussion. The captions were poorly-written and the choice of images is highly debatable. If the creator wants to put this back, please discuss here and get consensus. Deb (talk) 08:04, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If the importance of the selected event is in dispute, we can change it; if the subtitle is not well written, we can also ask native English speakers to help us edit it;Is there americocentrism? We can also change it. In some collages of years, American events occupy 4, 5, or even 6, why didn't I see you remove them??? And all new image does not have the problem of stretching and distortion of the old image.Nagae Iku (talk) 03:26, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to include a collage, first obtain consensus for what should be included, on this Talk page, instead of just shoving it into the article. Edit warring can get you blocked. Deb (talk) 07:41, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

1. I didn't get into an editting war with you, I only added a puzzle that didn't have any American elements 24 hours after you deleted the 1964 puzzle.Of course you deleted it again.

2.I promise to agree on what events to include in the talk before making the collage.

3.You don't need to threaten me with a ban; it is of no help in reaching consensus. Nagae Iku (talk) 09:13, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"September 26, 1963" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect September 26, 1963 has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 12 § September 26, 1963 until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 21:36, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]