Talk:Tarshish

Tharros

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tharros — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.104.7.72 (talk) 00:53, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

Tarish

Tarshish is often pronounced as Tarish (source: Lay Liturtical Resources)

That "reference" is a typo, look at the URL.--Error 02:29, 17 Feb 2005 (UTC)

---

Why no discussion on the theory that it refers to Ancient Briton? Britannia means Source of Tin. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.131.23.208 (talk) 00:15, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

It's extremely dubious whether ancient Phoenician ships ever got to Cornwall (certainly it was not on a regular Phoenician trade route), and pretty definite that Biblical Israelites knew nothing about it. It's also dubious whether there were P-Celts in Cornwall in ca. 850 B.C. Some 19th century authors were extremely fond of the idea of Phoenician ships reaching Cornwall, but modern historians generally consider this to be rather improbable... AnonMoos (talk) 03:29, 17 August 2011 (UTC)

Meaning of "island"

If Tarshish is described as an "island", this does not necessarily mean an island out to sea. It may have been a riverine island in ancient times. Alternatively, it may have been land mostly surrounded by rivers, as is the case for the plateau of Avallon in Burgundy. Zoetropo (talk)

Recent edits

There[1] besides the personal attacks in the edit summaries, have both made a mess of the article (duplicate references, a reflist within the body of the article, etc) and re-added material that doesn't belong in the article.

We now have a situation where " described Tarshish as “the city known in earlier rimes as Carthage and today called Tunis." is sourced not to the actual source, the State University of New York book, but to Thompson, C.M. 2003: 'Sealed silver in Cisjordan and the ‘invention’ of coinage,' Oxford Journal of Archaeology 22.1, 67–107, who I doubt has that quote from Isaac Abravanel in her article.

The wikilink to Frank Moore Cross's article that I added was removed.

And the following that was added this morning and that I removed was replaced: ". In 2003, Christine Marie Thompson identified the Cisjordan Corpus, a concentration of hacksilber hoards in Israel and the Palestinian Territories (Cisjordan). This Corpus dates between 1200 and 586 B.C., and the hoards in it are all silver-dominant. The largest hoard was found at Eshtemoa and contained 26kg of silver. Within it, and specifically in the geographical region that was part of Phoenicia, is a concentration of hoards dated between 1200 and 800 B.C. This concentration is unique in the contemporary Mediterranean, and its date-range overlaps with the reigns of King Solomon (990 - 931 B.C.) and Hiram of Tyre (980 - 947 B.C.). Hacksilber objects in these Phoenician hoards have lead isotope ratios that match ores in Sardinia and Spain. Contrary to translations that have been rendering Assyrian tar-si-si as 'Tarsus' up to the present time, Christine Thompson has shown that the Assyrian tablets inscribed in Akkadian indicate tar-si-si (Tarshish) was an island, and the poetic construction of Psalm 72 also points to its identity as a large island in the West. The island of Sardinia is indicated. The same evidence from hacksilber fits with what the ancient Greek and Roman authors recorded about the Phoenicians exploiting many sources of silver in the western Mediterranean to feed developing economies back in Israel and Phoenicia soon after the fall of Troy and other palace-centers in the eastern Mediterranean around 1200 B.C. Classical sources including Homer (8th century B.C.), and the Greek historians Herodotus (484-425 B.C.) and Diodorus Siculus (d. 30 B.C.) said the Phoenicians were exploiting the metals of the west for these purposes before they set up the permanent colonies in the metal-rich regions of the Mediterranean and Atlantic."

Most of that is completely irrelevant, I'd already added the relevant bit from Thompson & Skaggs about Tarshish, and the authors certainly do not suggest that there was a "fall of Troy" nor do Thompson & Skaggs say anything about "to feed developing economies back in Israel and Phoenicia" - they don't even talk about Israel. What the source does say about Tory is: "lassical texts that mention the beginnings of Phoenician westward expansion tend to place it chronologically just after the destruction of the palaces (represented in the Greek tradition by the fall of Troy), and spatially with enduring toponyms like Sardinia and Cádiz (Diodorus Siculus Bibliotheca Historica V.35.5, Velleius Paterculus I.2, 1-3, and Strabo III.2, 9-14)." I can't see how this becomes "fits with what the ancient Greek and Roman authors recorded about the Phoenicians exploiting many sources of silver in the western Mediterranean to feed developing economies back in Israel and Phoenicia soon after the fall of Troy". Doug Weller talk 16:19, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

Note that it was different new account who recently added the bit about Troy.[2] Doug Weller talk 16:41, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

Deleted "However, Solomon's Temple was destroyed by the Babylonians, making archaeological evidence difficult to uncover." for being nonsensical on several counts: 1) Building destruction would actually enable, not inhibit, the preservation of archaeological material; 2) the larger issue with excavating the area of the temple is that it was located, well, on the Temple Mount, where the Dome of the Rock and al-Aqsa currently stand; 3) the attribution of such wealth to Solomon is doubtlessly apocryphal and reflects, at best, exaggerated historical conditions of the eighth century BCE, if not later, so questions of extant archaeological evidence are irrelevant. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 185.120.126.43 (talk) 18:25, 15 July 2022 (UTC)

Error?

Why did this page previously claim that “2 Chronicles 9:21 erroneously situates it on the Red Sea” when 2 Chronicles 9:21 says nothing about the Red Sea? Primal Groudon (talk) 16:37, 13 August 2019 (UTC)