Wikipedia talk:Principles of Definition

This is the talk page of a redirect that targets the page:
• Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not
Because this page is not frequently watched, present and future discussions, edit requests and requested moves should take place at:
• Wikipedia talk:What Wikipedia is not

VfD vote - removed April 16, 2004 - no concensus to delete

Thanks for the clean up job and making it presentable.WHEELER 15:52, 8 Apr 2004 (UTC)

Question: In this sites definition of Fascism, it says "Fascism has come to mean..." What this says is that the word "Fascism" is being used as a term of propaganda. That is not what an encyclopaedia does. WE DO NOT CATALOGUE AS FACT PROPAGANDA. Well... as some people have said, It changes meaning throughout time. Right, those who are in control, change the meaning to suit their propaganda purposes. NO. The word means what it means in l930. The word is not a socialist word and then moves to being on the right. NO. This is plain propaganda.WHEELER 14:43, 16 Apr 2004 (UTC)

I added Philo's rule to the project page.WHEELER 13:51, 20 Apr 2004 (UTC)

Furthermore, if we use laws and reason, it will naturally be NPOV. We don't rely on opinion but the use of laws. This will ensure NPOV.WHEELER 13:53, 20 Apr 2004 (UTC)

I have a serious bone to pick. This is open content encyclopaedia. There is no way of knowing who contributes and what this persons expertise is. "Cite your sources" is a Policy here but it is not being done at all or being enforced.WHEELER 13:59, 21 Apr 2004 (UTC)