Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Weirdness plus

Weirdness plus was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was to delete.

So non-notable it makes my toes hurt. --fvw * 08:52, 2004 Nov 21 (UTC)

Delete. Postdlf 08:53, 21 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Delete: I hope they're joking. If not, this is even more trivial than a joke told by a non-recurring character on a Japanese cartoon show that has never been translated but which is shown only on the Internet. Geogre 16:18, 21 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Clearly near and dear to the hearts of those who were there at the time. But notability to anyone outside that small circle, alas, unestablished. Delete. -- Antaeus Feldspar 18:16, 21 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Delete. Notable only for its non-notability. --LeeHunter 18:47, 21 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Delete. Surely they're not serious??? David Johnson 17:20, 22 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Delete. NeoJustin 17:41, 22 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Keep. I find it fascinating, and can't really see any reason not to include it. Voyager640 02:21, 26 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Keep. Ditto Voyager64. Dahamsta 02:27, 26 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Light keep. Assuming that the editors ever go on to do something better, it would be useful to keep this article -Cookiemobsta 02:34, 26 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Delete, and merge this material in with an article on the magazine ''Throttle'' (magazine), if it is kept at all. - Scooter 04:48, 26 Nov 2004 (UTC)
A junior high school paper? Don't waste my time. Delete -R. fiend 07:34, 26 Nov 2004 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like other '/delete' pages is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.